--On 23.08.2000 10:15 Uhr -0600 Tony Olekshy wrote: > This form is documented as proposed in RFC 88: > > catch $@->{severity} eq "Fatal" => { ... } > > and I'm adding this to the next version, as a convenience method: > > catch $@->fatal => { ... } Agreed. That one is better than the different class :-) -- Markus Peter - SPiN GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-based error... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Glenn Linderman
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-ba... Glenn Linderman
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handling. Brust, Corwin
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handling. Peter Scott
- RE: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Markus Peter
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handling. Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Peter Scott
- Re: On the case for exception-based error han... Tony Olekshy
- Re: On the case for exception-based error handlin... Tony Olekshy