I don't really know anything about Photoshop Elements.
I just thought the price for a full version of Photoshop CS6 (or even
CS5) on Amazon is appalling. It's more than I paid for the full
shrink-wrap version of PhotoshopCS PLUS the upgrades to CS3, CS5 & CS6.
I just got to wondering if Photoshop Elements might be a viable option
for someone who wanted Photoshop, did NOT want the cloud version and
can't afford to shell out $1500+.
On 12/6/2014 9:14 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
John - Elements 5.0 definitely has layers and layer masks.
for photography I use photoshop without layers - except for adding my
copyright info or captions. But I do a fair amount of graphic design
stuff for the calendar covers,book covers, T-shirts, and such. It
doesn't seem to me that lightroom (from what people have said) would
ever be necessary for my workflow.
I'm sure I could use some lessons in maximizing the usefulness of
masks and layers but for the most part I can muddle through with what
I have. I sometimes go back to Elements 2 for some specific things
that seem to have been dropped by the subsequent versions.
ann
On 12/6/2014 03:15, Bob W-PDML wrote:
On 6 Dec 2014, at 01:11, John <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
I hadn't considered Photoshop Elements because I've not used it, but a
quick search tells me the later versions of Elements have at least some
of the tools I want that Lightroom doesn't seem to have - i.e. LAYERS,
layer masks, blending modes ...
LR and PS are built around different metaphors. Layers are a graphic
design concept, not a photography concept. LR is built around the idea
of a darkroom, where there are no layers as far as I recall. This I
think is key to understanding LR.
What results can you achieve with layers etc. that you can't achieve
in LR by a more 'darkroomy' means?
I think these things often come down to people preferring what they're
used to. When they're used to doing something one way in a system,
that can sometimes seem like the only way. So if a new system achieves
the same outcome differently people can struggle to adapt, and find
themselves fighting against the new system, trying to force-fit it
into the old metaphor. I've been watching people do this at work for
35 years and I've been through it myself a few times, notably when I
first encountered a computer mouse, and also when I discovered
relational database theory, which I eventually decided is the dog's
bollocks and the secret of life itself (well almost - that accolade
goes to discrete mathematics).
B
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
