What you say is true if you strike the words "perfectly happily".
On 12/6/2014 2:53 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
LR can work perfectly happily with whatever folder structure you set up.
B
On 6 Dec 2014, at 02:03, John Coyle <[email protected]> wrote:
My experience is the same as Paul's. LR is good at processing successive
images with the same
settings, but I found its cataloguing system did not work for me: my folder
structure suits my needs
better. I do have both via the subscription module, and the long term benefit
is that you always
have the latest version without any additional cost, rather than having to
spend several hundred
dollars every few years (even if you skipped intermediate upgrades).
John in Brisbane
-----Original Message-----
From: PDML [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
Sent: Saturday, 6 December 2014 9:25 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: The horse is dead, but let's flog it some more anyway.
I use photoshop exclusively. I frequently do a lot of post work and ps is the
best tool in many
cases. But more importantly it's familiar and feels right. I have my own filing
system that I access
with Bridge. It's all working fine. Tried Lightroom 2 years ago, didn't like it.
Paul via phone
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
