Why? I see no great advantage to CF over SD. I've had equipment that used both of these card types for a long time. I find the SD format easier to manage because they're smaller, but there's nothing much in either direction to choose between them. d
Godfrey On Jun 21, 2007, at 3:26 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: > But Sandisk Ultra II are much slower than the Transcend 150X. You > have to go to the Sandisk Extreme III to top or match the Transcend > for speed. I use both Transcend and Sandisk now. I had a Transcend > that simply failed right off the shelf. But I had a Sandisk that > broke apart when the little plastic bits that separate the contacts > started to fall apart. Both could be better. Give me back by CF cards! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
