With the *ist-D I accumulated 4 -1GB cards, 2 - 2GB cards and 5 - 4GB cards.
Be nice if I could have used them with the K-10D instead of having to start all over again with a new type of card. And have to keep up with two sets of cards since I still use the *ist-D for my backup. Other than that there's probably no real advantage. > From: > Godfrey DiGiorgi > > Why? I see no great advantage to CF over SD. > > I've had equipment that used both of these card types for a long time. > I find the SD format easier to manage because they're smaller, but > there's nothing much in either direction to choose between them. d > >> On Jun 21, 2007, at 3:26 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> But Sandisk Ultra II are much slower than the Transcend 150X. You >> have to go to the Sandisk Extreme III to top or match the Transcend >> for speed. I use both Transcend and Sandisk now. I had a Transcend >> that simply failed right off the shelf. But I had a Sandisk that >> broke apart when the little plastic bits that separate the contacts >> started to fall apart. Both could be better. Give me back by CF cards! -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
