Uhhh - this MZ-D is nice. I'd buy it even if I have to remorgage my house! Having owned a MZ-S I know the beautiful feel of this well designed magnesium body feels! I would prefere an aditional Body Aperture Control Wheel, though. In theory I liked the MZ-S simplicity (Super A like), but the PZ-1 like way the *ist D works is simply the best!
Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Sam Jost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 19. november 2004 19:01 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: D70 vs DS A few days ago I had the short pleasure to hold and try a D70 in swap for my *istD - the *istD just 'feels' better in hand, even the proud D70 owner said so. But I'm still not sure if I'm happy he made a way better picture with my *istD then me with his D70 (honestly no surprise here his kit lens against my 1.2/50 in extreme lowlight was unfair) The viewfinder seemed not too bad to me, but I didn't really compare and maybe attributed the darkness to the lens. Sam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 6:52 PM Subject: Re: D70 vs DS > On 19/11/04, Graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>All you need is a DS or D for parts, and a thousand dollars or so and you >>could >>graft the veiwfinder from the Pentax onto the Nikon just like you do > with the >>lenses. That is plus the D70 of course. > > But what an ugly brute! I'm thinking of designing something from scratch > - something that everyone wants, looks fabulous, works well, full frame > digital - heck the MZ-D would have done it nicely... > > <http://www.imaging-resource.com/EVENTS/PMAS01/982079635.html> > > > > > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ||=====| http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________ >
