On 26 Oct 2004 at 23:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Assuming it's useful wide open, which I've heard that it might not be > for some people's standards--if the 14 is better wide open then it's more > like a two stop difference. I haven't had the money to fiddle with > anybody's 15mm lens to know how good they are at any aperture--most of > the 15mm lens designs are rather old. I bought a cheap sigma 14mm lens > and have regretted it every time I use it.
My A15/3.5 performance is quite good and if I had taken the time to correct the CA in the RAW conversion the following very quick examples would be much better in that regard. The following lack lustre images were shot quickly hand held using my *ist D with multi-segment metering and focus at infinity stop, they are about 1.5MB each and will only be up for a day or two: http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP7394.jpg f7.1 http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP7395.jpg f18 http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP7396.jpg f3.5 Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
