Oh yes, I'll feel so much better knowing I'm using lenses
specially designed for my $1500 camera that cost less than
1/10 as much as the body.  Especially when I have lenses
that should work that are better built and have superb
optics.

At 08:39 AM 6/10/03 -0700, you wrote:
Hi Everyone,

I think I may have figured out Pentax logic behind the
FA-J lenses. I'm certainly not agreeing with it of
course.
OK as everybody knows the *ist D has a 1.5 x
magnification factor, so if you make FA-J lenses that
are specifically designed for it, they don't have to
be as sharp or as high quality optically around the
edges, especially when it comes to an 18mm zoom that
can save big bucks; Right? However nobody with an
MZ-S, MZ-3 or an LX will buy an inferior FA-J lens
without an aperture; Right? Pentax says that they will
still make lenses with an aperture for those cameras,
Right?
They also say that the FA-J's are entry level lenses
and the *ist is an entry level camera; Right?

Maybe there is a method to the madness; Right?
WRONG!!!

A Fellow Pentaxian,
Ryan


__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM). http://calendar.yahoo.com

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read. --Groucho Marx



Reply via email to