Correct.
The DOF difference is only a few millimeters at most @ 5' distance.
Collin
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "dosk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:14:38 -0500
>Albano
>
>Before shelling out big bucks, I would check out some of the various Pentax
>lens reviews if I were you. What you say about the 1.7 and 1.4 glass is
>truly verified by all of them, but then most all of them also say that
>moving to a Pentax f 1.2 is moving down, not up! The quality of sharpness in
>the 1.2 lens (at f 1.4 and beyond) is supposedly very much inferior to the
>others, and doesn't justify the expensive price tag laid on it. Most
>reviewers say to buy this lens only if you often experience situations that
>are so low light they absolutely require f 1.2. (Which appears to be the
>only aperture it works well at..?) One reviewer also went so far to say that
>with today's available fast films, (ISO 800, 1600), there is no reason ever
>to buy this bulky, un-sharp lens....
>
>Greywoulf
--
-- "They have vanquished freedom
and have done so to make men happy."
the Grand Inquisitor in "The Brothers Karamazov"
--
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
visit http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions.
