On 12/14/2011 02:57 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:18:33PM +0800, Gao,Yan wrote:
On 12/13/11 04:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Gao,Yan<y...@suse.com> wrote:
On 12/12/11 17:52, Florian Haas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Gao,Yan<y...@suse.com> wrote:
On 12/12/11 17:16, Florian Haas wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Gao,Yan<y...@suse.com> wrote:
On 12/12/11 15:55, Gao,Yan wrote:
Hi,
As some people have noticed, we've provided a new feature "Resource
templates" since pacemaker-1.1.6. I made a document about it which is
meant to be included into "Pacemaker_Explained". I borrowed the
materials from Tanja Roth , Thomas Schraitle, (-- the documentation
specialists from SUSE) and Dejan Muhamedagic. Thanks to them!
Attaching it here first. If you are interested, please help review it.
And if anyone would like to help convert it into DocBook and made a
patch, I would be much appreciate. :-)
I can tell people would like to see a crm shell version of it as well.
I'll sort it out and post it here soon.
Attached the crm shell version of the document.
As much as I appreciate the new feature, was it really necessary that
you re-used a term that already has a defined meaning in the shell?
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/crm_cli.html#_templates
Couldn't you have called them "resource prototypes" instead? We've
already confused users enough in the past.
Since Dejan adopted the object name "rsc_template" in crm shell, and
call it "Resource template" in the help. I'm not inclined to use another
term in the document. Opinion, Dejan?
I didn't mean to suggest to use a term in the documentation that's
different from the one the shell uses. I am suggesting to rename the
feature altogether. Granted, it may be a bit late to have a naming
discussion now, but I haven't seen this feature discussed on the list
at all, so there wasn't really a chance to voice these concerns
sooner.
Actually there were discussions in pcmk-devel mailing list. Given that
it has been included into "pacemaker-1.2" schema and released with
pacemaker-1.1.6, it seems too late for us to change it from cib side
now
Technically its not yet in the 1.2 area, that change was pending on
this documentation update.
OK then. I would like to hear more voices about that, since Dejan and
Tim have been working on this for quite some time too.
Well, I believe that we already discussed the name. And there
were no better ideas heard. But it could as well be that my
memory fails me.
I don't recall any better naming ideas floating past either (although,
now that Florian mentions "prototype", hmm...)
Anyway, IMO, overloading the word "template" isn't /too/ bad. It could
be qualified if necessary as "resource template" (the new feature we're
talking about here) and "configuration template" (existing shell feature)...
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Serong
Senior Clustering Engineer
SUSE
tser...@suse.com
_______________________________________________
Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org
http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
