On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> wrote: > On 12/12/11 17:52, Florian Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> wrote: >>> On 12/12/11 17:16, Florian Haas wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12/12/11 15:55, Gao,Yan wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> As some people have noticed, we've provided a new feature "Resource >>>>>> templates" since pacemaker-1.1.6. I made a document about it which is >>>>>> meant to be included into "Pacemaker_Explained". I borrowed the >>>>>> materials from Tanja Roth , Thomas Schraitle, (-- the documentation >>>>>> specialists from SUSE) and Dejan Muhamedagic. Thanks to them! >>>>>> >>>>>> Attaching it here first. If you are interested, please help review it. >>>>>> And if anyone would like to help convert it into DocBook and made a >>>>>> patch, I would be much appreciate. :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> I can tell people would like to see a crm shell version of it as well. >>>>>> I'll sort it out and post it here soon. >>>>> Attached the crm shell version of the document. >>>> >>>> As much as I appreciate the new feature, was it really necessary that >>>> you re-used a term that already has a defined meaning in the shell? >>>> >>>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/crm_cli.html#_templates >>>> >>>> Couldn't you have called them "resource prototypes" instead? We've >>>> already confused users enough in the past. >>> Since Dejan adopted the object name "rsc_template" in crm shell, and >>> call it "Resource template" in the help. I'm not inclined to use another >>> term in the document. Opinion, Dejan? >> >> I didn't mean to suggest to use a term in the documentation that's >> different from the one the shell uses. I am suggesting to rename the >> feature altogether. Granted, it may be a bit late to have a naming >> discussion now, but I haven't seen this feature discussed on the list >> at all, so there wasn't really a chance to voice these concerns >> sooner. > Actually there were discussions in pcmk-devel mailing list. Given that > it has been included into "pacemaker-1.2" schema and released with > pacemaker-1.1.6, it seems too late for us to change it from cib side > now
Technically its not yet in the 1.2 area, that change was pending on this documentation update. _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
