On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 04:18:33PM +0800, Gao,Yan wrote: > On 12/13/11 04:25, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> wrote: > >> On 12/12/11 17:52, Florian Haas wrote: > >>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> wrote: > >>>> On 12/12/11 17:16, Florian Haas wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> wrote: > >>>>>> On 12/12/11 15:55, Gao,Yan wrote: > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> As some people have noticed, we've provided a new feature "Resource > >>>>>>> templates" since pacemaker-1.1.6. I made a document about it which is > >>>>>>> meant to be included into "Pacemaker_Explained". I borrowed the > >>>>>>> materials from Tanja Roth , Thomas Schraitle, (-- the documentation > >>>>>>> specialists from SUSE) and Dejan Muhamedagic. Thanks to them! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Attaching it here first. If you are interested, please help review it. > >>>>>>> And if anyone would like to help convert it into DocBook and made a > >>>>>>> patch, I would be much appreciate. :-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I can tell people would like to see a crm shell version of it as well. > >>>>>>> I'll sort it out and post it here soon. > >>>>>> Attached the crm shell version of the document. > >>>>> > >>>>> As much as I appreciate the new feature, was it really necessary that > >>>>> you re-used a term that already has a defined meaning in the shell? > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/crm_cli.html#_templates > >>>>> > >>>>> Couldn't you have called them "resource prototypes" instead? We've > >>>>> already confused users enough in the past. > >>>> Since Dejan adopted the object name "rsc_template" in crm shell, and > >>>> call it "Resource template" in the help. I'm not inclined to use another > >>>> term in the document. Opinion, Dejan? > >>> > >>> I didn't mean to suggest to use a term in the documentation that's > >>> different from the one the shell uses. I am suggesting to rename the > >>> feature altogether. Granted, it may be a bit late to have a naming > >>> discussion now, but I haven't seen this feature discussed on the list > >>> at all, so there wasn't really a chance to voice these concerns > >>> sooner. > >> Actually there were discussions in pcmk-devel mailing list. Given that > >> it has been included into "pacemaker-1.2" schema and released with > >> pacemaker-1.1.6, it seems too late for us to change it from cib side > >> now > > > > Technically its not yet in the 1.2 area, that change was pending on > > this documentation update. > OK then. I would like to hear more voices about that, since Dejan and > Tim have been working on this for quite some time too.
Well, I believe that we already discussed the name. And there were no better ideas heard. But it could as well be that my memory fails me. Cheers, Dejan > Regards, > Gaoyan > -- > Gao,Yan <y...@suse.com> > Software Engineer > China Server Team, SUSE. > > _______________________________________________ > Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org > http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker > > Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org > Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf > Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org _______________________________________________ Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker@oss.clusterlabs.org http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
