Hi Joe, WG, I support the adoption of this draft. This draft is useful, filling the gap of extending RFC 9105 TACACS+ YANG with the enhancement of TACAS+ TLS.
While reading the document, I'm having trouble understanding the 'sever' part YANG of the 'remote-address' and 'domain-name' extensions. I fail to find any explanation for them in the draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-tls13. Thanks, Bo Wu From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 9:24 PM To: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG]CALL FOR ADOPTION: A YANG Model for Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) over TLS 1.3 The IPR poll has concluded (no known IPR has been disclosed), and we would like to start a two week adoption poll for draft-boucadair-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang/>. Please respond on-list with support and especially comments. The adoption call will run until November 5. Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
