Hi Joe, all, A bis would be cleaner, especially given the warnings in the abstract of 9105.
However, to the initial question from Tom, this is IMO the kind of decision that needs WG consensus and thus should happen after adoption. Cheers, Med De : Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Envoyé : vendredi 1 novembre 2024 14:05 À : tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com>; opsawg@ietf.org Objet : [OPSAWG]Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: A YANG Model for Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) over TLS 1.3 Good question, Tom. As a contributor, I think a bis might make things more understandable given the amount of augmented objects. I'd like to hear from the authors and other T+ TLS 1.3 implementors. Joe From: tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com<mailto:ie...@btconnect.com>> Date: Friday, November 1, 2024 at 08:53 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jcla...@cisco.com<mailto:jcla...@cisco.com>>, opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> <opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: CALL FOR ADOPTION: A YANG Model for Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) over TLS 1.3 p.3 Discussion Note: RFC 9105bis or keep the current augment design. Is this a topic that needs resolving prior to adoption? I do not know what the ramifications are. Tom Petch ________________________________________ From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>> Sent: 22 October 2024 14:23 To: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: [OPSAWG]CALL FOR ADOPTION: A YANG Model for Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) over TLS 1.3 The IPR poll has concluded (no known IPR has been disclosed), and we would like to start a two week adoption poll for draft-boucadair-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang/>. Please respond on-list with support and especially comments. The adoption call will run until November 5. Thanks. Joe ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
