Hi Rebecca, Thanks for all the pointers.
I have reviewed the Errata, and agree that it should be Verified. I will wait till the EOD today to hear any objections, absent which I will go ahead and approve it. Cheers. > On Jul 10, 2024, at 11:00 AM, Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrhee...@amsl.com > <mailto:rvanrhee...@amsl.com>> wrote: > > Hi Mahesh, > > The RPC reviews editorial errata per a decision in 2021; if the RPC cannot > handle a particular editorial erratum, we ask the AD to review. > > We have encountered such a case with this erratum -- we consider the change > from “srhActiveSegmentIPv6” to “srhSegmentIPv6” to be above editorial. We > have thus changed the Type to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review > and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/ > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata-definitions/>). > > Note that Thomas (author) submitted the report, and Benoit (another author) > supports verifying it. See > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/fE1FoUZRmuIOP5nS9O7DISFJYzo/ > <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/fE1FoUZRmuIOP5nS9O7DISFJYzo/>. > > You may review the report at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8020 > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8020> > > Information on how to verify errata reports can be found at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/ > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/how-to-verify/> > > Further information on errata can be found at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php> > > Thank you, > RFC Editor/rv > > >> On Jul 6, 2024, at 6:43 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org >> <mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>> wrote: >> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9487, >> "Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information >> Export (IPFIX)". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8020 >> <https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8020> >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Thomas Graf <thomas.g...@swisscom.com >> <mailto:thomas.g...@swisscom.com>> >> >> Section: appendix-A.2 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9487#figure-7 >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9487#figure-7> >> >> 0 1 2 3 >> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Set ID = 3 | Length = 24 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Template ID 259 | Field Count = 3 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Scope Field Count = 1 |0| srhActiveSegmentIPv6 = 495 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Scope 1 Field Length = 4 |0|srhSegmentIPv6End.Behav = 502| >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 1 |0|srhSegmentIPv6Lo.Length = 501| >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 4 | Padding | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9487#figure-8 >> >> 0 1 2 3 >> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | SET ID = 259 | Length = 28 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | srhActiveSegmentIPv6 = 2001:db8::1 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> |srhSegmentIPv6EndpointBehavior |srhSegmentIPv6LocatorLength= 48| >> |= End [1] | | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | srhActiveSegmentIPv6 = 2001:db8::4 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> |srhSegmentIPv6EndpointBehavior |srhSegmentIPv6LocatorLength= 48| >> |= End with NEXT-CSID [43] | | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | srhActiveSegmentIPv6 = 2001:db8::6 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> |srhSegmentIPv6EndpointBehavior |srhSegmentIPv6LocatorLength= 48| >> |= End.DX6 [16] | | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> >> >> >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9487#figure-7 >> >> 0 1 2 3 >> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Set ID = 3 | Length = 24 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Template ID 259 | Field Count = 3 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Scope Field Count = 1 |0| srhSegmentIPv6 = 494 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Scope 1 Field Length = 4 |0|srhSegmentIPv6End.Behav = 502| >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 1 |0|srhSegmentIPv6Lo.Length = 501| >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | Field Length = 4 | Padding | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9487#figure-8 >> >> 0 1 2 3 >> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | SET ID = 259 | Length = 28 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | srhSegmentIPv6 = 2001:db8::1 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> |srhSegmentIPv6EndpointBehavior |srhSegmentIPv6LocatorLength= 48| >> |= End [1] | | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | srhSegmentIPv6 = 2001:db8::4 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> |srhSegmentIPv6EndpointBehavior |srhSegmentIPv6LocatorLength= 48| >> |= End with NEXT-CSID [43] | | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> | srhSegmentIPv6 = 2001:db8::6 | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> |srhSegmentIPv6EndpointBehavior |srhSegmentIPv6LocatorLength= 48| >> |= End.DX6 [16] | | >> +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ >> >> Notes >> ----- >> Example in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9487#appendix-A.2 should >> state IE494 srhSegmentIPv6 instead of IE495 srhActiveSegmentIPv6 for >> mapping the IE510 srhSegmentIPv6LocatorLength and IE502 >> srhSegmentIPv6EndpointBehavior in IPFIX option-template as described in >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9487#section-6.2 >> >> Errata has been reported to me by a software developer of a major vendor >> working on implementation. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it >> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC9487 (draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-14) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP >> Flow Information Export (IPFIX) >> Publication Date : November 2023 >> Author(s) : T. Graf, B. Claise, P. Francois >> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >> Source : Operations and Management Area Working Group >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG >> > Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com <mailto:mjethanand...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
