Hi Med,Thanks. The impetus for this work is that some think that MUD files need a license statement. As such, the augment should be sufficient in this case; but I will raise the question in netmod. As to this:
On 06.05.2024 11:16, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
2. I know that you don’t use the security template in 8520, but given that you are introducing a reusable module I think that you should include it this time. In particular, please see the template of the reusable grouping here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-11#name-security-considerations-sect (see the last two para).
I can borrow that text no problem. Thanks again. Eliot
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
