I understand now that the extensions attribute in RFC8520 can be used to add modules. This is distinctly not-YANG.
I wonder if we should have done this for RFC8366bis?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
