Eliot Lear <l...@lear.ch> wrote:
> consideration. Michael, I don't think it's necessary in this case to
> update 8520 because we *are* indeed creating a new namespace. However,
> this wasn't properly indicated in the draft.
I don't have any idea how that would work. Can you give me an example JSON
file along with some YANG that will validate it with yanglint?
The issue is that 8520 does not import (augment) from ol, so the new code is
not there.
If it *did* import from ol, then it would create a new namespace which wasn't
8520.
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
