Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Ilya Lipnitskiy > Sent: Freitag, 19. Februar 2021 02:45 > To: Hannu Nyman <hannu.ny...@iki.fi> > Cc: Jason A . Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com>; openwrt-devel <openwrt- > de...@lists.openwrt.org>; Adrian Schmutzler <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireguard-tools: Add dependency on kmod-wireguard > > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:11 AM Hannu Nyman <hannu.ny...@iki.fi> > wrote: > > There the solution was an additional virtual kernel package, which > > could then handle the kernel mainline / oot dependency difference inside > the target. > > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3039 > Thanks for all the great feedback. How about this: > > 1. Convert kmod-wireguard into a virtual package; 2. Create kmod- > wireguard-oot (for Linux 5.4) and kmod-wireguard-it (for Linux 5.10); 3. > Remove the virtual wireguard package (no one depends on it); 4. When Linux > 5.4 support is removed, remove kmod-wireguard and rename kmod- > wireguard-it to kmod-wireguard.
FYI: We once had a similar situation with sched-cake, where we named the meta-package -virtual: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/commit/56db8e461546c06f9103b5965e697f2d582d4bdc I'd personally prefer that naming scheme here as well if we stick to the meta-package approach. Best Adrian > > That way, existing kmod-wireguard dependencies don't have to be touched > at all. > > Ilya > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
