On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 8:31 PM Ilya Lipnitskiy <ilya.lipnits...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 5:57 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote: > > > > I've backported WireGuard patch-by patch to 5.4, in a series that you > > can simply apply to your existing 5.4 kernels. I can prepare that for > > you guys tomorrow. That way, you'll have the kernel module in both 5.4 > > and 5.10 through the same mechanisms with the same code. That might > > save a lot of the complexity that this discussion is veering toward. > > > > How's that sound? > I've implemented the virtual package way I proposed in an earlier > email. The changes are part of this pull request: > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3885 > > If the reviewers are happy with my changes I think we are done. > Otherwise, please chime in if we'd rather go the backport way with > Jason's help. The backport route is annoying as it means it would need to be maintained separately from the module.
It's a moot point anyway. The release will be using the module. This only concerns snapshot which will migrate to 5.10 eventually. > > - Ilya > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
