Hi, On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:21 AM Adrian Schmutzler <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> wrote: > I don't really get the point of this justification. Either wireguard-tools > depends on kmod-wireguard, or it doesn't. In the first case, and only then, > it should be "fixed" (with a proper justification describing that). Are wireguard-tools useful without the underlying kernel module? It didn't seem like it to me, although maybe Jason should chime in here, as maintainer and developer of Wireguard.
> I don't understand how we need all the strategic discussion to decide this. > That's probably a discussion for later on. The idea is to enable in-tree wireguard kernel modules on Linux 5.10 with a plan to phase out the out-of-tree module when 5.4 is taken out. Reducing cross-repository dependencies makes it easier to accomplish. - Ilya _______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
