Hi, > -----Original Message----- > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-boun...@lists.openwrt.org] > On Behalf Of Ilya Lipnitskiy > Sent: Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2021 18:48 > To: Adrian Schmutzler <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> > Cc: Jason A . Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com>; openwrt-devel <openwrt- > de...@lists.openwrt.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireguard-tools: Add dependency on kmod-wireguard > > Hi, > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 9:21 AM Adrian Schmutzler > <m...@adrianschmutzler.de> wrote: > > I don't really get the point of this justification. Either wireguard-tools > depends on kmod-wireguard, or it doesn't. In the first case, and only then, it > should be "fixed" (with a proper justification describing that). > Are wireguard-tools useful without the underlying kernel module? It didn't > seem like it to me, although maybe Jason should chime in here, as maintainer > and developer of Wireguard.
Then why didn't you use that as the reason for your patch? > > > I don't understand how we need all the strategic discussion to decide this. > That's probably a discussion for later on. See above. Best Adrian > The idea is to enable in-tree wireguard kernel modules on Linux 5.10 with a > plan to phase out the out-of-tree module when 5.4 is taken out. > Reducing cross-repository dependencies makes it easier to accomplish. > > - Ilya > > _______________________________________________ > openwrt-devel mailing list > openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ openwrt-devel mailing list openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
