On Thu, 05 May 2016 18:24:09 +0200, Daniel Dickinson
<open...@daniel.thecshore.com> wrote:
On 16-05-05 12:21 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
[snip]
> The changes that the Lede guys are suggesting would be welcome,
but
> splitting the project and community with an ugly fork is very
much not
> welcome.
Let's just say that there are strong personalities who haven't been
working well together and that this has been a long time coming;
perhaps
if something like using a mediator had been considered before
things got
to this point it would have helped. At this point I'm not sure
there is a
solution unless both sides are willing to bend a little (I'm really
not
sure who has been flexible and who has not, but as I have said I
suspect
a large part of the issue is that 'management' (who aren't and
don't,
really) has overruled those doing the majority of the work and in an
open source project that doesn't fly).
I don't disagree. I just see the current state of Openwrt/Lede as a
mess for the community.
I agree, I just don't see how the LEDE team could have avoided it
without giving up and accepting the broken status quo.
I hope you realize the LEDE team created most of that status quo.
Imre
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
