On Thu, 05 May 2016 17:44:43 +0200, Daniel Petre <daniel.pe...@posteo.net>
wrote:
On 05/05/2016 06:38 PM, Jonathan Bennett wrote:
There is plenty of blame to go around, I think. Seems like the Lede
guys should have had the decency to at least inform the Openwrt
leadership privately that they were planning this venture.
If i read correctly the feedback from the LEDE guys (and many of the
people in here) then it seems EVEN THEY did not had any serious real
feedback since a while ago from the main OpenWrt "headquarters".
So.. what do you do when you ask (probably several times) and do not get
any answer at all.. ?
They were in charge. When the lead developer and the release manager claim
they had no power to change the way (yet both procd and netifd got
introduced without prior discussion or agreement), you know something is
fishy.
Imre
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
