From: Matt Joyce <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday 3 March 2016 at 18:35
To: Robert Starmer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: openstack-operators
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [Openstack-operators] [openstack-community] Recognising Ops
contributions
How about just OPS : {$Verified_Count} Physical Nodes
=D
It would make visits to the Marketplace interesting…. Wandering around with a
badge with the number of nodes would certainly get vendor attention :-)
Overall, I’d like to be sure we cater for non-Ops contributions also. There are
consumers of clouds to factor into the discussion and i’d like to see something
where a contributor to the foundation application catalog gets credit or an ISV
in the marketplace.
Tim
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Robert Starmer
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I setup an etherpad to try to capture this discussion:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OperatorRecognition
R
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Robert Starmer
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I agree with the list of contributions that should garner value, and I really
like TOC, because some folks who meet the other operators requirements may not
actually _run_ OpenStack, they may "operate" on top :)
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Edgar Magana
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello Folks,
I have to admit that I really like these two:
TOC / Technical Ops Contributor
IRO / I Run OpenStack
Edgar
From: Pierre Freund <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:57 AM
To: Edgar Magana <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc:
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>,
"Jonathan D. Proulx" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Shilla
Saebi <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-community] Recognising Ops contributions
This needs a catchy name.
Yes, yes it does. Suggestions?
Some suggestions, but I'm not a native english speaker, it might sounds not
natural.
AOC / Active Ops Contributor
ACC / Active Community Contributor
TOC / Technical Ops Contributor
Proud Ops
POP / Proudly Operating in Production
IRO / I Run OpenStack
--
Pierre F
reund
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-operators mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
