I agree with the list of contributions that should garner value, and I really like TOC, because some folks who meet the other operators requirements may not actually _run_ OpenStack, they may "operate" on top :)
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com> wrote: > Hello Folks, > > I have to admit that I really like these two: > > TOC / Technical Ops Contributor > IRO / I Run OpenStack > > Edgar > > From: Pierre Freund <pierre.fre...@osones.com> > Date: Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:57 AM > To: Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com> > Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" < > openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>, "commun...@lists.openstack.org" > <commun...@lists.openstack.org>, "Jonathan D. Proulx" <j...@csail.mit.edu>, > Shilla Saebi <shilla.sa...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [openstack-community] Recognising Ops contributions > > *This needs a catchy name.* >> Yes, yes it does. Suggestions? >> > > Some suggestions, but I'm not a native english speaker, it might sounds > not natural. > > AOC / Active Ops Contributor > ACC / Active Community Contributor > TOC / Technical Ops Contributor > Proud Ops > POP / Proudly Operating in Production > IRO / I Run OpenStack > > -- > Pierre F > reund > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-operators mailing list > OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
