I setup an etherpad to try to capture this discussion: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OperatorRecognition
R On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Robert Starmer <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with the list of contributions that should garner value, and I > really like TOC, because some folks who meet the other operators > requirements may not actually _run_ OpenStack, they may "operate" on top :) > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Edgar Magana <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello Folks, >> >> I have to admit that I really like these two: >> >> TOC / Technical Ops Contributor >> IRO / I Run OpenStack >> >> Edgar >> >> From: Pierre Freund <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:57 AM >> To: Edgar Magana <[email protected]> >> Cc: "[email protected]" < >> [email protected]>, "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]>, "Jonathan D. Proulx" <[email protected]>, >> Shilla Saebi <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-community] Recognising Ops contributions >> >> *This needs a catchy name.* >>> Yes, yes it does. Suggestions? >>> >> >> Some suggestions, but I'm not a native english speaker, it might sounds >> not natural. >> >> AOC / Active Ops Contributor >> ACC / Active Community Contributor >> TOC / Technical Ops Contributor >> Proud Ops >> POP / Proudly Operating in Production >> IRO / I Run OpenStack >> >> -- >> Pierre F >> reund >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
