I setup an etherpad to try to capture this discussion: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/OperatorRecognition
R On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Robert Starmer <rob...@kumul.us> wrote: > I agree with the list of contributions that should garner value, and I > really like TOC, because some folks who meet the other operators > requirements may not actually _run_ OpenStack, they may "operate" on top :) > > > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com> > wrote: > >> Hello Folks, >> >> I have to admit that I really like these two: >> >> TOC / Technical Ops Contributor >> IRO / I Run OpenStack >> >> Edgar >> >> From: Pierre Freund <pierre.fre...@osones.com> >> Date: Thursday, March 3, 2016 at 6:57 AM >> To: Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com> >> Cc: "openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org" < >> openstack-operators@lists.openstack.org>, "commun...@lists.openstack.org" >> <commun...@lists.openstack.org>, "Jonathan D. Proulx" <j...@csail.mit.edu>, >> Shilla Saebi <shilla.sa...@gmail.com> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-community] Recognising Ops contributions >> >> *This needs a catchy name.* >>> Yes, yes it does. Suggestions? >>> >> >> Some suggestions, but I'm not a native english speaker, it might sounds >> not natural. >> >> AOC / Active Ops Contributor >> ACC / Active Community Contributor >> TOC / Technical Ops Contributor >> Proud Ops >> POP / Proudly Operating in Production >> IRO / I Run OpenStack >> >> -- >> Pierre F >> reund >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-operators mailing list >> OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators >> >> >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-operators mailing list OpenStack-operators@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-operators
