> > I just wonder why nobody raised issues with the name while it was on the > proposed names wiki page, while it was on the ballot, or while it was > under final consideration. We've known that "Meiji" was an option for > one month, and that it was #3 in the candidate names for more than 2 > weeks. And yet nobody ever raised any issue with it until it was > officially chosen and announced, at which point it's a lot more > difficult to change. > > I have been aware of this potential issue since it was on the ballot. I actually hesitated to raise this issue worrying it might cause un-wanted debate between members. I basically thought voting process would filter this kind of controversial word. Then, I saw that this name was #3, and thought I did not need to raise the issue since it was not on the top.
As Thierry said, I should have raised the issue back then, not at this last moment. I sincerely apologize for that. I have my lesson learned throughout this case. BTW, I have to say that I am really happy that we are able to resolve this kind of difficult issue as a community, respecting each other. -- Jaesuk Ahn > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
