-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 IMO the 2.0 interface looks way more like a "developer's interface" than 1.*'s
On 10/3/2010 14:42, Kelly Linden wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) < > mag...@matrisync.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Kelly Linden <ke...@lindenlab.com> >> wrote: >>> Windlight settings should be a part of the build and not something >>> you have to opt into or be bugged with a dialog to see.* >> >> Well, then how about automatic applications of animations to your >> avatar, because a "content creator" thought it would be arty or cool? >> > > Welcome to the other nightmare I'm dealing with for server 1.38. Ultimately > there is a difference between affecting the personification of *you* by > animating you or taking your controls or your camera hostage and changing > how the world you are in looks. > > >> Or malicious Windlight settings that blind you, because it's >> "artistic" and "part of the shared experience"? >> > > I've been banned from viewer UI design, for good reason. I end up with > developer UI, and with 2.0 they managed to scrub the last remnants of my UI > from SL. That aside, I could see 'reset the damn sky' as a top level action > similar to 'stand' - a button on screen above the bottom bar maybe. And a > good keyboard shortcut. Yes, it should be possible for a blinding sky to be > part of an artistic shared experience, and it should be easy to get out of. > And yeah, some advanced option for 'don't let my windlight settings change' > seems like a good idea also. But the default should be for the windlight > environment to be part of the content you are visiting. > >> >> The enhancement request as it stands calls for a permissions opt-in >> for having your viewer settings changed, and I support it in that >> form. >> > > I admit I only briefly skimmed the jira. I was mostly reacting to the panic > I saw here. I don't think it needs a permission request in the case of > parcel owners, but that is just my personal opinion. I do believe the > environment should be promoted to being part of the content and not part of > the viewer, I think we get more amazing in world experiences that way. > > - Kelly > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuX22sACgkQ8ZFfSrFHsmXs/ACghovGVkFbLcJARpFywLiBD9m2 aecAn2OGHi9LiqaoqGPClI+YGS9Xq0R8 =ARH9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
