On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 15:57 -0500, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Domino Marama > <dom...@dominodesigns.info> wrote: > > > I'd hope things like attachment sizing scripts would move to client side > > scripts. > > I guess that would be nice, but the data that would have to flow to > the attached hair prims would be substantial....and the prims would > still have to be scripted. I wouldn't expect to see much savings from > that.
Depends on implementation. I'm assuming client side scripts won't need transferring sim to sim on teleports, so scripts such as these that don't need to be active on the sim seem like good candidates to me. If anything I'd have thought the data flow with the vehicle scripts would be more of an issue as that'd be constant messaging between the client and server parts. It would need careful testing to make sure that moving the maths client side was more efficient. Even without my crazy ideas on doing torque based acceleration curves, it's likely that people will overdo messaging (if it's a feature) with stuff like client hud speedos for vehicles.. _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
