UNIX admin wrote:
>> Actually, I'd just prefer to remove the .conf file
>> altogether.  The only 
>> reason it is put on the system is for documentation,
>> and quite frankly, 
>> folks should be using ndd instead.  (Until ndd is
>> replaced by Brussels.)
>>
>> I could just not deliver the .conf file at all, if
>> that is preferable.
>>     
>
> How will consumers of your product know which tunables they can change that 
> are particular to the dmfe driver (or any network driver for that matter), if 
> they are expected to go through `ndd`?
>   

Standard practice:  "ndd /dev/dmfe \?"

The "?" parameter lists all of the parameters.

There is also the ieee802.3(5) man page.

    -- Garrett
>  
>  
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-code mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
>   

_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code

Reply via email to