UNIX admin wrote:
>> Actually, I'd just prefer to remove the .conf file
>> altogether. The only
>> reason it is put on the system is for documentation,
>> and quite frankly,
>> folks should be using ndd instead. (Until ndd is
>> replaced by Brussels.)
>>
>> I could just not deliver the .conf file at all, if
>> that is preferable.
>>
>
> How will consumers of your product know which tunables they can change that
> are particular to the dmfe driver (or any network driver for that matter), if
> they are expected to go through `ndd`?
>
Standard practice: "ndd /dev/dmfe \?"
The "?" parameter lists all of the parameters.
There is also the ieee802.3(5) man page.
-- Garrett
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> _______________________________________________
> opensolaris-code mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
>
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-code mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code