On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaof...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Laurent Gauch > <laurent.ga...@amontec.com> wrote: >> Actually, the FTDI d2xx driver is still much faster than LIBFTDI + LIBUSB >> ... >> If you are Linux only try using FTDI d2xx driver ;-) ! >> But the actual linux d2xx driver do not provide the same performances as the >> windows performance. > > Under Linux, FTD2xx is based on libusb 0.1. > > According to the author of libftdi-1.0 (Jie Zhang), libftdi 1.0 which is > based on libusb 1.0 can greatly increase the performance of FT2232x > based JTAG debuggers based on his evaluation of UrJTAG (from > 10.3KB/s to 110.2KB/s for his BlackFin target). >
Reference thread here (UrJTAG). http://www.mail-archive.com/urjtag-developm...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00149.html -- Xiaofan http://mcuee.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
