> FWIW, this will not bring GPL-compliance. Is that the goal, or just > loadable library support? I am in favor of this later, but I thought > you were pushing for the former.
Under Windows an executable will fail to load if it links implicitly to a dll even if that dll is not used. It's prefectly legitimate to have a GPL compliant dll that may not be present on the system. So far so good. Transparent attempts at circumventing GPL lie down this same path, so keep your eyes peeled :-) -- Øyvind Harboe Embedded software and hardware consulting services http://www.zylin.com _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
