Zach Welch pisze:
> FWIW, this will not bring GPL-compliance.

How could that possibly bring GPL compliance?

> Is that the goal, or just
> loadable library support?  I am in favor of this later, but I thought
> you were pushing for the former.

Later.

> I want to see a patch before commenting about whether or not it should
> be accepted here.

I'm not a kind of developer that does such things in "a blink of an 
eye", so I'd rather not waste my time if - for example - some developers 
are highly against dynamic loading. That's clear that you won't add 
something I propose without judgement, but I'm rather asking about 
attitude towards such concept.

4\/3!!
_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to