> > you are using the wrong calling convention if this happens. > > Note the WINAPI > > Dude - you rule! That was exactly the problem - I've copied > the typedef for pointers from msdn and the example used > __cdecl instead of WINAPI. > Changing that with your suggestion fixed the problem [; > > Thx <: >
been there many times myself!! > I'm wondering now whether I should be doing such things... /; > > Anyway - would such feature be accepted to OpenOCD (if fully > tested and working of course)? I think that it would be a > good addition, because no libraries would have to be > distributed with OpenOCD releases. Now - when all interfaces > are enabled - the distro should have libftdi.dll (or > ftd2xx.dll) and libusb0.dll - even if the end-user doesn't need them. > Personally i think it is a good addition - i am not a fan of binding dll's at link time. At least then openocd can be built for all interfaces and the user does not have to install libusb and libftdi etc. Cheers Spen _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
