On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 22:25 +0100, Spencer Oliver wrote: > > > you are using the wrong calling convention if this happens. > > > Note the WINAPI > > > > Dude - you rule! That was exactly the problem - I've copied > > the typedef for pointers from msdn and the example used > > __cdecl instead of WINAPI. > > Changing that with your suggestion fixed the problem [; > > > > Thx <: > > > > been there many times myself!! > > > I'm wondering now whether I should be doing such things... /; > > > > Anyway - would such feature be accepted to OpenOCD (if fully > > tested and working of course)? I think that it would be a > > good addition, because no libraries would have to be > > distributed with OpenOCD releases. Now - when all interfaces > > are enabled - the distro should have libftdi.dll (or > > ftd2xx.dll) and libusb0.dll - even if the end-user doesn't need them. > > > > Personally i think it is a good addition - i am not a fan of binding dll's > at link time. > At least then openocd can be built for all interfaces and the user does not > have to install > libusb and libftdi etc.
FWIW, this will not bring GPL-compliance. Is that the goal, or just loadable library support? I am in favor of this later, but I thought you were pushing for the former. I want to see a patch before commenting about whether or not it should be accepted here. Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
