On Monday 22 June 2009, Zach Welch wrote: > So, notably absent from this list are any type of "wrapper" library. > Several contributors oppose this as an option, particularly as these > suggestions appear to derive exclusively from the present desire to > circumvent the GPL distribution restrictions. For these reasons, I hope > the community will stop considering such solutions.
I would like my mailbox to stop getting filled with "how can we circumvent this software license" crap too. Just stop; if the license bothers you, work to change it not circumvent it. (Or start your own project with a proprietary license.) Certain People were on the verge of getting blacklisted... > Please let me know if this summary is factual incorrect or incomplete. Summary seemed fair to me. _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
