On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 20:20 +0200, Freddie Chopin wrote: [snip] > > Why do you consider it OK to ignore a license just because it > > inconveniences you? Do you hold the same view regarding things you create? > > Why do you consider it OK to overinterpret the license just because it > inconveniences you? In things I create I take the pragmatic view - when > something is given for free (like the ftd2xx.dll library) than it is > meant to be used, for free - I'm not creating artificial problems that > would prevent me to use that "something". [snip]
Why do you consider it OK to ignore what I and other contributors are saying about the license? Why do you feel it necessary to disrespect our copyright claims? If we interpret it thusly, why do you think that your interpretation should be considered more valid than ours view? What if I told you that my interpretation is based in part on having paid an attorney to counsel me in such nuances? Would that matter? You are being disrespectful to contributors that have made this decision; it is theirs to make and theirs alone. In that way, there is no doubt that you _are_ creating problems by beating this dead horse. What will it take to get you and others to drop this issue? Cheers, Zach _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
