On Jun 22, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Zach Welch wrote:
Actually, I see no reason that it cannot be GPL too. It's "only" a build tool; it will not be linking to either OpenOCD or FTD2XX, right?The full GPL would prevent others from creating proprietary versions of your tool, which may or may not be what you desire personally; however, your license does not impact the licenses of what the tool builds. This is why the "build kit loophole" works: they are totally separate works. Otherwise, a GPL package manager could only build/install GPL packages!
Don't give the FSF any ideas. -- Rick Altherr kc8...@kc8apf.net"He said he hadn't had a byte in three days. I had a short, so I split it with him."
-- Unsigned
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
