Alain Mouette schrieb: > > R.Doss escreveu: >> I have the same attitude like Freddie. Now it is a bug in the licence, >> this is to correct! > > +1 I vote with him :) > > > Now... who can make that call? Is there someone with code in OpenOCD > > who is against such a relicensing? > > Now, this can be a problem :( This is one of the main reason why Sun > and Google are so strict about contributors owning the copyright, even > if GPLed. > > Alain > The lack has existed from the first version and all later code inherit this fault. The first code come from Dominic Rath. Is this right? The best way is to ask Dominic, what he prefer.
Way one: change in licence Way two: The distribution with D2XX library ist illegal Way two has also a hard problem. If anyone has make this misstake. It can bring trouble. I can bet on one homepage or on a CD from a journal we will found such distribution. And what then? I can read in the newspaper a free programmer has used a free software and stand in the court. Also not too nice. Rene Doss _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
