On Sunday 14 June 2009, Freddie Chopin wrote:
> If OpenOCD aims to be uber-GPLv3-h4x0r-friendly that's perfectly fine,

The issue has *nothing* to do with being l33t.


> but I just can't imagine majority of vista64 users building their own
> copy of OpenOCD. 

I won't disagree.  So the fix is getting them a library vendors
can distribute without violating the licensing agreement.  Until
one exists, there are other workarounds available.


_______________________________________________
Openocd-development mailing list
Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development

Reply via email to