Øyvind Harboe wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Pieter Conradie > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi Øyvind and Pavel, >> >> Some of the e-mails went into the mailing list digest and I did not get them >> in sequence. Now that I have read all the e-mails in sequence I understand. >> >> A "reset" will be the same as "reset run". If I want to reset and halt the >> target, >> then I have to use "reset run_and_init" explicitly. I agree that this is >> more intuitive. > > Dominic suggested that perhaps removing the default argument altogether would > be a good idea since expectations differ. > > That would satisfy my requirement too that "reset" does something predictable.
OOI, on other JTAG debuggers, reset does have a default, usually specified in some way from the config file. Also, I do like the existing behaviour, as on other JTAG debuggers that if a type of reset is specified then that becomes default for 'reset' from then on, so i.e. if you do a "reset init", then a subsequent unadorned "reset" repeats "reset init". I would like for that to be retained. Another little thing I'll throw out: flash programming should be straightforward, and usually involves running the init script to set up chip selects etc. So you would hope that by default (one way or another) people don't have to do extra things for flash programming. Jifl -- eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571 Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071. ------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine _______________________________________________ Openocd-development mailing list Openocd-development@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openocd-development
