On Sat, 16 Nov 2024 22:36:17 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> If we do this, then here are some possible names: > > * jfx.experimental.release > * jfx.experimental.release.name > * jfx.variant.release > * jfx.variant.release.name > * jfx.variant > * jfx.feature.variant > > Thoughts? I don't have objections against any of those. If I have to vote, my vote would go to "jfx.feature.name" (which is not in the list ;) ) because I associate variant rather with a single option from a wider set (e.g. prism variants are sw, es2,,...) But I am more than happy with any name on this list. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1637#issuecomment-2481057217
