On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 21:26:30 GMT, Kevin Rushforth <k...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I'm not so sure about this, since there's already "iio" in in the name. > > How about one of the following as an alternative? > > * com.sun.javafx.iio.java2d > * com.sun.javafx.iio.j2d > * com.sun.javafx.iio.desktop > > That's roughly in preference order, but I like any of them better than > `...iio.javax`. Renamed to `com.sun.javafx.iio.java2d`. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1593#discussion_r1831751600
