On Wed, 18 Sep 2024 13:22:45 GMT, Marius Hanl <mh...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Yes, please. I made a similar comment on Draft PR #1569 > > Agree, would be good to be consistent, especially now, where we anyway > convert everything to JUnit 5 and have the chance to be consistent. yep, for some reason I incorrectly decided that Timeout was not applicable. will change to Timeout. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jfx/pull/1561#discussion_r1765277494
