On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 12:44 AM Richard Leitner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 01:09:10PM GMT, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 12:08 AM Frank de Brabander via > > lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Op 3 aug 2024 om 18:51 heeft akuster808 <[email protected]> het > volgende geschreven: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 7/31/24 4:07 AM, Frank de Brabander wrote: > > > >> I was unaware of this discussion when I created the fix for master. > > > >> Note that I've silenced the TMPDIR QA message, this still needs a > > > >> proper fix in master as well. > > > >> > > > >> This indeed needs to be fixed in scarthgap as well, since the > > > >> incompatible versions do break some code. My two cents for the > available > > > >> options: > > > >> > > > >> - Revert pydantic upgrade (from 2.7.0 back to 2.6.4) > > > >> - Update pydantic-core to 2.18.1 > > > >> - Use master (pydantic 2.7.3 and pydantic-core 2.18.4) > > > >> > > > >> Would only downgrade if this is the *only* allowed option according > to > > > >> the LTS branch policy. Version 2.7.x includes new features compared > to > > > >> 2.6.4. Removing these with a downgrade would violate the LTS patch > policy > > > >> of not merging "ABI/API breakage". > > > > > > > > We have had this type of situation with a pkg (A) update in master > and then new lts was branched. We found out other later additional pkgs > needed to updated to work with pkg (A). pydantic update was in Master > before scarthgap was branched. > > > >> > > > >> Option 2 or 3 are my preferred choices and they fall within the > > > >> "fixes for bugs" category of the LTS patch policy. Option 2 is the > smallest > > > >> change to fix the problem, but option 3 includes some additional > upstream > > > >> fixes with the update from 2.7.0 to 2.7.3. > > > > > > > > Master should be failing so if Master gets a revert of pydantic back > to 2.6.4, then Scarthgap will follow. Is this an option? - Armin > > > > > > As far as I know master works now, so a revert would make no sense in > that case. > > > > Hi Armin > > > > scarthgap is relatively new and I think I would be in favor of making > > an exception for this one case. > > Hi Khem, > thanks. Sounds good to me. > > Do you prefer going to the same pydantic{,-core} version as master, > or stick with 2.7.0 and update only pydantic-core to 2.18.1?. > Best is to use the one that will work in tandem well if that would be newer one from master than we might have to bring that too > > regards;rl >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#111677): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/111677 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/107073841/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
