> Op 3 aug 2024 om 18:51 heeft akuster808 <[email protected]> het volgende 
> geschreven:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 7/31/24 4:07 AM, Frank de Brabander wrote:
>> I was unaware of this discussion when I created the fix for master.
>> Note that I've silenced the TMPDIR QA message, this still needs a
>> proper fix in master as well.
>> 
>> This indeed needs to be fixed in scarthgap as well, since the
>> incompatible versions do break some code. My two cents for the available
>> options:
>> 
>>  - Revert pydantic upgrade (from 2.7.0 back to 2.6.4)
>>  - Update pydantic-core to 2.18.1
>>  - Use master (pydantic 2.7.3 and pydantic-core 2.18.4)
>> 
>> Would only downgrade if this is the *only* allowed option according to
>> the LTS branch policy. Version 2.7.x includes new features compared to
>> 2.6.4. Removing these with a downgrade would violate the LTS patch policy
>> of not merging "ABI/API breakage".
> 
> We have had this type of situation with a pkg (A) update in master and then 
> new lts was branched. We found out other later additional pkgs needed to 
> updated to work with pkg (A). pydantic update was in Master before scarthgap 
> was branched.
>> 
>> Option 2 or 3 are my preferred choices and they fall within the
>> "fixes for bugs" category of the LTS patch policy. Option 2 is the smallest
>> change to fix the problem, but option 3 includes some additional upstream
>> fixes with the update from 2.7.0 to 2.7.3.
> 
> Master should be failing so if Master gets a revert of pydantic back to 
> 2.6.4, then Scarthgap will follow. Is this an option? - Armin

As far as I know master works now, so a revert would make no sense in that case.

>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Frank
> 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#111509): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/message/111509
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/107073841/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-devel/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to