It seems to me saying "SD-JWT is not an anonymous credential system
according to <link>" then seems sufficient, as most of the other text is
already present in the thorough unlinkability section.
Also I see that it gets increasingly difficult, if drafts have to
enumerate all the things that they are not, this is a slippery slope
that may never be complete.
Best, Paul
On 1/9/25 8:32 PM, Watson Ladd wrote:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 10:39 AM Dean Saxe
<dean.saxe=40beyondidentity....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
I’m struggling with the same thing. If there’s somewhere that this is
described/documented it should be linked from the text. I added the same
comment to the PR.
https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/535#issuecomment-2580990520
We can link to CL01, but I think there might be some easier to
understand presentations. Will look.
-dhs
--
Dean H. Saxe, CIDPRO
Principal Engineer
Office of the CTO
Beyond Identity
dean.s...@beyondidentity.com
On Jan 9, 2025 at 10:20:56 AM, Paul Bastian <paul.bast...@posteo.de> wrote:
Hi Watson,
Could you please link the standard security notation for anonymous credentials
that you are referring to?
Best, Paul
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
