On Thu, Jan 9, 2025 at 11:18 AM Watson Ladd <watsonbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2025, 10:14 AM Watson Ladd <watsonbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 9, 2025, 10:10 AM Pierce Gorman <pierce.gor...@numeracle.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Watson, >>> >>> I thought it was a good suggestion and am looking forward to feedback >>> from others. >>> >>> I didn't understand the part of the statement in the penultimate >>> sentence which says, "but cannot work for Issuers". I should probably >>> understand what you meant without having to ask, but I don't. >>> >>> Can you please elaborate what you meant about workarounds such as >>> issuing multiple one-time-use credentials at once (if I understood that >>> correctly) not working for issuers? >>> >> >> Let's change that to "cannot prevent Issuers from linking issuance to >> showing". Does that help? >> > > Actually I see Brian already made a better edit to fix it in the PR > I think that particular edit should be credited to Danial but yes -- _CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
