While it's been a few weeks, I've made these changes and posted the Device profile as an Internet Draft: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-device-00. We're working on an implementation at Facebook and hope to provide feedback toward the next draft.
In the meantime I'd like to request that it move to become a Working Group item. I'm am happy to continue acting as the editor. --David On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:41 PM, David Recordon <record...@gmail.com> wrote: > Even better, thanks! > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Michael D Adams <m...@automattic.com>wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:11 PM, David Recordon <record...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary) >> >> “The client makes the following request at an arbitrary but reasonable >> >> interval which MUST NOT exceed the minimum interval rate provided by >> >> the authorization server (if present via the "interval" parameter).” >> >> >> >> My understanding is that the intervals between the client’s subsequent >> >> requests must not be less than the value provided by the “interval” >> >> parameter (if it is present). If that is correct than the intervals >> between >> >> the subsequent requests MUST exceed (or be equal to) the value of the >> >> “interval” parameter. >> > >> > Thanks! Reworded to "The client makes the following request at an >> arbitrary >> > but reasonable interval which MUST NOT be less than the minimum interval >> > rate provided by the authorization server" >> >> It still sounds confusing to me. Part of the problem is that we're >> talking both about an interval (a length of time) and a frequency >> (requests per unit of time). >> >> How about: >> >> The client makes the next request after an arbitrary but reasonable >> length of time, which MUST be longer than or equal to the minimum >> length of time provided by the authorization server in the "interval" >> parameter if present. >> >> >> I changed "following" to "next" because the former makes it sound like >> the next paragraph will have details about the request. >> >> I changed "at an arbitrary" to "after an arbitrary" since we're >> talking here about lengths of time. >> >> I replaced "interval" with "length of time" to make it clear we're >> talking about the length of time and not the corresponding frequency. >> >> Mike >> --mdawaffe >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >> > >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
